Self-serve AI sourcing platforms
The hireEZ / SeekOut / Pin category gives you more candidates, faster, from a bigger database. You still do the evaluation yourself.
Ranked.I hands recruiting agencies and lean TA teams a precise, calibrated shortlist for a role: senior human judgment, measured against real hiring outcomes. No subscriptions, no black-box platforms, no software to configure.
There are two common ways to solve this problem today, and Ranked.I is neither:
The hireEZ / SeekOut / Pin category gives you more candidates, faster, from a bigger database. You still do the evaluation yourself.
They route your role to a network of outside experts who recommend candidates from their own contacts. You get warm introductions, but no measurable accuracy standard.
One calibrated shortlist, ranked by a person, checked against your actual bar, with the accuracy published. Smaller scope, more accountability.
We don't guess. We measure our ranking against how real engineering leaders evaluate talent, and we show the math.
What that means in plain terms: a kappa above 0.60 is considered strong agreement between two independent human raters. Our ranking agrees with an experienced hiring manager about as much as two experienced hiring managers agree with each other.
We're happy to walk you through the methodology. No other sourcing service in this space publishes a number like this.
We'd rather tell you 5-7 days and beat it than promise 48 hours and miss it.
5-7 days for a brand-new role, 24-48 hours if it's a repeat of a role we've already calibrated.
Illustrative rows. A real board carries forty named profiles with live links, your language and relocation checks, and a verify flag wherever the public record is thin.
A single bad senior hire typically costs far more than our fee: in salary, ramp time, and the search you'll have to run again.
Compared to a contingency agency fee (commonly 15-25% of first-year salary), a calibrated shortlist costs a fraction of that, without committing you to a placement fee before you've seen a single candidate.
You're not paying for more resumes. You're paying for a shortlist someone with judgment has already stood behind, with the accuracy shown, not claimed.
Senior sourcing and a calibrated shortlist in 5-7 days.
For re-opening a role we've already scoped (24-48 hours).
Includes GitHub scans, AI task recordings, and written candidate scoring rubrics.
For teams with continuous hiring needs.
We stay lean on purpose. You work exclusively with the principals executing the search: never an account manager, never a hand-off, never a support queue.
A decade inside developer-infrastructure companies, now building AI-driven sourcing and calibration pipelines. Disciplined, rigorous human judgment, never a black box.
Execution and strategic alignment, making sure the shortlist matches your engineering bar with precision.
Those give you a bigger haystack, faster. We give you a shortlist someone has already checked, with the accuracy of that check published.
Those route your role to outside experts recommending from their own contacts. Good for warm intros, but there's no standard way to measure how accurate the recommendations are. We calibrate against your specific bar and show you the number.
Currently we're focused on developer and data roles, where the calibration has been tested. We'd rather say that plainly than overreach.
If it's not yet, that's worth sorting out internally before starting a search.
Send the role. We reply within one business day.